So you thought all those Vioxx studies in medical journals were independent, hands-off affairs? Not necessarily. An examination of medical journal articles about Vioxx and court documents from Vioxx lawsuits found that Merck employees or ghostwriters were frequently involved in various articles, but the primary authors were often academics who actually had little to do with the studies or didn't always disclose financial ties to Merck.
Read article at pharmalot.com
An examination of medical articles about rofecoxib (a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) and court documents from litigation related to this product indicates that company employees or other unacknowledged authors were frequently involved in writing clinical trial articles and review articles, but that primary authorship was often attributed to academically affiliated investigators who may have had little to do with the study, or who did not always disclose financial support from the sponsor of the study, according to an article in the April 16 issue of JAMA.
Read article at physorg.com
Friday, April 18, 2008
Ghostwriters, guest authors re. Vioxx and rofecoxib
Posted by Willow at 8:20 pm
Labels: clinical trials, rofecoxib, Vioxx
Subscribe to: